Huizhou Eslinda Technology Co.,Ltd.
Public registration snapshot and company identity context for supplier due diligence.
This snapshot currently shows
- registration status Active.
- registered region Huizhou City, Huicheng District.
- established on Aug 13, 2019.
- legal representative 张少雄.
- source data last refreshed on May 22, 2026.
Need a deeper company check?
Move from this public snapshot to a fuller company report when you need more context before payment, contracting, or onboarding.
Fact summary
- English name
- Huizhou Yashili Technology Co., Ltd
- Chinese registered name
- 惠州市雅诗丽科技有限公司
- USCC / credit code
- 91441302MA53LNJM7W
- Legal representative
- 张少雄
- Established
- Aug 13, 2019
- Region
- Huizhou City, Huicheng District
- Registered capital
- ¥1,000,000 RMB
Company identity mapping
The public page uses the English name "Huizhou Eslinda Technology Co.,Ltd." as a readable label for the Chinese registered entity "惠州市雅诗丽科技有限公司". The underlying company record is matched to the English company name "Huizhou Yashili Technology Co., Ltd" where available.
English names can be translated, self-reported, or used commercially. Before payment or contract signing, confirm that the English-facing supplier identity matches the Chinese legal entity and unified social credit code.
The registered region shown for this entity is Huizhou City, Huicheng District. Cross-check that region against contracts, invoices, shipping documents, and bank instructions when supplier details are being verified.
What to verify next
Use the facts on this page as a checklist before you rely on supplier identity, payment details, or contracting documents.
- Confirm that the unified social credit code on invoices, contracts, bank details, and supplier documents matches the code shown on this page exactly.
- Treat "Huizhou Eslinda Technology Co.,Ltd." as a readable supplier-facing label, but verify whether it maps cleanly to the company name "Huizhou Yashili Technology Co., Ltd" in contracts, invoices, catalogs, and payment instructions.
- Cross-check the region "Huizhou City, Huicheng District" against shipping documents, onboarding forms, invoices, and beneficiary information to catch location mismatches early.
- If the transaction is sensitive, compare the listed legal representative "张少雄" against authorization documents, company chops, and public filing materials where available.
- Review what the registration status "Active" means for your transaction, especially if you are about to pay, sign a contract, or onboard the supplier.
- If timing matters, re-check the entity close to payment or signature time because the current public snapshot was last refreshed on May 22, 2026.
Why these facts matter
This snapshot currently shows the company as "Active". That supports basic existence checks, but it still does not confirm payment safety, contract performance, or current operational quality.
This page uses "Huizhou Eslinda Technology Co.,Ltd." as the readable English-facing label, while the company record is tied to "Huizhou Yashili Technology Co., Ltd" and the Chinese entity "惠州市雅诗丽科技有限公司". That distinction matters when supplier branding differs from the registered legal name.
The available region for this record is Huizhou City, Huicheng District. Use that region as a cross-check against invoices, shipping paperwork, onboarding forms, and beneficiary details.
The listed legal representative is 张少雄. This is another identity anchor you can compare with contracts, seals, authorization letters, and public records.
The underlying public registration snapshot was last refreshed on May 22, 2026. If your payment or signing decision depends on the latest state, re-check the entity when the transaction window is time-sensitive.
Before payment, compare the registered company identity, credit code, and region against invoices, contracts, banking instructions, and supplier communications.
Important boundary
This page is based on public registration information and internal presentation logic for identity review.
It is designed to support company verification and due-diligence decisions, not to guarantee commercial safety or trustworthiness.
It does not constitute legal advice, legal conclusions, or an accusation about the company.